Boston Celtics Vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats

Boston won. Orlando deserved better. And the stat sheet is genuinely confusing if you only look at the final score.

The Celtics beat the Magic 113–108 at TD Garden on April 12, 2026 – but Orlando outrebounded them by 12, scored more fast-break points, and won the paint battle too.

Paolo Banchero posted a triple-double. The Magic’s bench outscored Boston’s bench nearly 2-to-1.

So how did they lose by five?

Boston Celtics Vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats

One quarter, one shooting gap, and 22 perfect free throws from Boston. That’s the whole story. Let’s get into the numbers.

Boston Celtics Vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats – Game Details

Score by Quarter

Orlando won the first quarter by nine points. The teams were dead even in the second.

Then came the third — Boston scored 42, held the Magic to 20, and that 22-point swing was the game.

Orlando clawed back 27 in the fourth, but it wasn’t enough.

A 42-point quarter this late in the regular season is rare.

Boston got there through three-point shooting, free throws, and transition offense that the Magic simply couldn’t contain for a full 12 minutes.

Boston Celtics vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats — Celtics

Baylor Scheierman — 30 PTS | 7 REB | 7 AST

The best player on the floor Sunday night. Scheierman hit six threes, went 8-of-8 from the line, and was a plus-15 in his minutes. He’s not a name most casual fans know, but this was a legitimate 30-point, seven-assist performance in a tight game.

Luka Garza — 27 PTS | 12 REB

Garza was quietly dominant. He shot 55.6% from the field, made three of six three-pointers, and grabbed 12 boards. His +13 was the second-best on the team. The Magic had no consistent answer for him inside.

Ron Harper Jr. — 27 PTS | 7 REB | 4 AST

Harper scored 13 of his 27 in transition and finished with a true shooting percentage of 64.7%. He was the spark Boston needed in the first half when Orlando looked the sharper team. Shot 50% from the field, 41.7% from three.

Full Celtics Box Score

Boston shot 100% from the free-throw line as a team — 22-of-22. That’s not a typo.

Boston Celtics vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats — Magic

Paolo Banchero — 23 PTS | 10 REB | 11 AST (Triple-Double)

The triple-double headline is accurate, but the shooting line tells the real story: 7-of-22 from the field, 0-of-5 from three. Banchero got his stats the hard way — attacking the rim (14 points in the paint), drawing fouls (9-of-11 from the line), and making plays for teammates. Six turnovers cost him. Still, his 11 assists kept Orlando in it longer than they deserved to be.

Jalen Suggs — 23 PTS | 6 REB | 3 AST

Suggs was Orlando’s most efficient scorer. He shot 46.7% from three (7-of-15) and converted every single fast-break opportunity he touched (3-of-3). His true shooting percentage of 67.6% led the team. The +6 tells you the Magic played better with him on the floor.

Franz Wagner — 20 PTS | 4 REB

Wagner did his job. Twenty points, four free throws made, five fouls drawn, and consistent movement. He went 7-of-18 from the field — not great, but not the reason Orlando lost. His -4 net rating was roughly neutral.

Anthony Black — 13 PTS | 3 REB

Shot 55.6% from the field and was perfect in the paint (4-of-4 conversions). His -13 +/- reflects bad luck with lineup timing more than poor play — he was on the floor during Boston’s run.

Full Magic Box Score

Team Stats: Celtics vs Magic

Read those numbers again. Orlando had more fast-break points, more points in the paint, more rebounds, and more bench production.

They were the better team in four of the five most common indicators of physical dominance in an NBA game.

And they lost.

The Real Reason Boston Won

Two things decided this:

• 1. Three-point shooting gap. Boston made 19 threes. Orlando made 12. That’s seven extra made threes — worth roughly 21 additional points before you factor in the possessions. Suggs was excellent from deep (7-of-15), but everyone else struggled. Wagner went 2-of-7. Banchero was 0-of-5. Da Silva was 0-of-2. Boston spread the damage across Scheierman, Harper, Garza, and Tonje — four players all shooting 33% or better from three.
• 2. Boston’s free-throw perfection. Going 22-of-22 from the line is almost statistically improbable for a full game. Orlando shot 24-of-30 (80%) — perfectly respectable. But Boston left six points on the table for them while losing none themselves. In a five-point game, that’s the margin.

The third quarter was the stage where both of these factors combined. Boston hit threes, got to the line, and scored 42 points in 12 minutes while holding Orlando to 20. That’s not a strategy — that’s a team catching fire at exactly the right moment.

FAQs

• What was the final score of Celtics vs Magic on April 12, 2026?

Boston Celtics 113, Orlando Magic 108. The Celtics won at TD Garden.

• Did Banchero get a triple-double against Boston?

Yes. He finished with 23 points, 10 rebounds, and 11 assists — but shot just 31.8% from the field with six turnovers.

• Who led Boston in scoring vs the Magic?

Baylor Scheierman with 30 points on 6-of-14 three-point shooting. Luka Garza and Ron Harper Jr. each added 27.

• How did Orlando lose despite dominating the boards?

Boston’s three-point shooting (19-of-50) and perfect free-throw shooting (22-of-22) offset Orlando’s rebounding edge. A 42-point third quarter from Boston also ended any real contest.

• Who shot the most threes for Orlando vs Boston?

Jalen Suggs hit 7-of-15 from three — the only Magic player who had a good night from deep. Wagner (2-of-7) and Banchero (0-of-5) both struggled.

• Where can I find ESPN box scores for Celtics vs Magic?

ESPN’s NBA scoreboard carries full box scores shortly after each game. The complete player stats for this game are also in the tables above.

Conclusion:

Final: Boston Celtics 113, Orlando Magic 108.

The Magic played a genuinely good game and still lost by five.

Banchero’s triple-double (23/10/11), Orlando’s 40 fast-break points, and their 62 rebounds are the kind of numbers that win most games.

They didn’t win this one because Boston couldn’t miss from the line, made seven more threes, and exploded for 42 in the third.

If you’re watching this series develop heading into the playoffs, that Q3 is the number to focus on — not the final score.

About the Author

Karan

Administrator

Visit Website View All Posts